Details: Just as Louis XVI was known for setting up and bringing about Orwellianism and double standards in treating his population, Frederick II was renowned for being a staunch and religious person who was more straight forward with his people and would rule the country in light of his religious honor and zeal rather than through underhanded procedures which gave the rich and the elite vast power over the poor and the needy. Had Frederick II been in charge, his policies and ruling strategies would have surely prevented the monarchy from falling into disarray and ending with a revolution that swept across the nation.

Conclusion: Frederick II’s set of standards would have been most analogous with the theories and philosophies of Voltaire, because as the world was quickly coming out of its medieval imprint and making rapid developments in science and medicine, the modern rulership tactics and ideas employed by the 13th century Roman Emperor were mostly optimistic and were far more apt at resolving the crises France was embroiled in than Louis XVI, even though they were from very different times and shared very different leadership approaches and outlooks.